Guinea vs Nepal: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Guinea
6.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Nepal
6 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Guinea rank
162nd
Nepal rank
165th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Guinea
- Nepal
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 6.5 DB17-20 methodology against 6 DB17-20 methodology in Nepal, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Nepal ahead.
Guinea ranks 162nd and Nepal ranks 165th of 187 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Guinea or Nepal?
- Guinea, at 6.5 DB17-20 methodology against 6 DB17-20 methodology in Nepal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Guinea and Nepal?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Nepal?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Guinea and Nepal rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Guinea ranks 162nd and Nepal ranks 165th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.