Indonesia vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Indonesia
15.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of
16 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Indonesia rank
88th
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
85th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Indonesia
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 16 DB17-20 methodology against 15.5 DB17-20 methodology in Indonesia, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Iran, Islamic Republic of has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 88th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 85th of 187 countries.
Iran, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Indonesia or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 16 DB17-20 methodology against 15.5 DB17-20 methodology in Indonesia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Indonesia and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Indonesia and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Indonesia ranks 88th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 85th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.