Iran, Islamic Republic of vs South Africa: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Iran, Islamic Republic of
16 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
South Africa
15.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
85th
South Africa rank
88th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- South Africa
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 16 DB17-20 methodology against 15.5 DB17-20 methodology in South Africa, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Iran, Islamic Republic of has been ahead every year.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 85th and South Africa ranks 88th of 187 countries.
Iran, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Iran, Islamic Republic of or South Africa?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 16 DB17-20 methodology against 15.5 DB17-20 methodology in South Africa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Iran, Islamic Republic of and South Africa?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and South Africa rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 85th and South Africa ranks 88th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.