Japan vs Luxembourg: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Japan
25.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Luxembourg
25.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Japan rank
20th
Luxembourg rank
20th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Japan
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Japan currently reports 25.5 DB17-20 methodology against 25.5 DB17-20 methodology in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 20th and Luxembourg ranks 20th of 187 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Japan or Luxembourg?
- Japan, at 25.5 DB17-20 methodology against 25.5 DB17-20 methodology in Luxembourg as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Japan and Luxembourg?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Luxembourg?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Luxembourg rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Japan ranks 20th and Luxembourg ranks 20th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.