Japan vs North Macedonia: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Japan
25.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
North Macedonia
25 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Japan rank
20th
North Macedonia rank
23rd
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Japan
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Japan currently reports 25.5 DB17-20 methodology against 25 DB17-20 methodology in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 20th and North Macedonia ranks 23rd of 187 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Japan or North Macedonia?
- Japan, at 25.5 DB17-20 methodology against 25 DB17-20 methodology in North Macedonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Japan and North Macedonia?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and North Macedonia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Japan and North Macedonia rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Japan ranks 20th and North Macedonia ranks 23rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.