Kiribati vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Kiribati
9 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
9 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Kiribati rank
132nd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
132nd
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Kiribati
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 9 DB17-20 methodology against 9 DB17-20 methodology in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 132nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 132nd of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Kiribati or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Kiribati, at 9 DB17-20 methodology against 9 DB17-20 methodology in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Kiribati and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Kiribati ranks 132nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 132nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.