Kiribati vs Togo: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Kiribati
9 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Togo
9.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Kiribati rank
132nd
Togo rank
130th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Kiribati
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 9.5 DB17-20 methodology against 9 DB17-20 methodology in Kiribati, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 132nd and Togo ranks 130th of 187 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Kiribati or Togo?
- Togo, at 9.5 DB17-20 methodology against 9 DB17-20 methodology in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Kiribati and Togo?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Togo?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Togo rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Kiribati ranks 132nd and Togo ranks 130th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.