Lebanon vs Tonga: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Lebanon
16 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Tonga
15.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Lebanon rank
85th
Tonga rank
88th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Lebanon
- Tonga
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 16 DB17-20 methodology against 15.5 DB17-20 methodology in Tonga, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Tonga ahead.
Lebanon ranks 85th and Tonga ranks 88th of 187 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Lebanon or Tonga?
- Lebanon, at 16 DB17-20 methodology against 15.5 DB17-20 methodology in Tonga as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Lebanon and Tonga?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Tonga?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Lebanon and Tonga rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Lebanon ranks 85th and Tonga ranks 88th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.