Netherlands vs Singapore: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Netherlands
28.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Singapore
28.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Netherlands rank
1st
Singapore rank
1st
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Netherlands
- Singapore
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 28.5 DB17-20 methodology against 28.5 DB17-20 methodology in Singapore, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Netherlands ahead.
Netherlands ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Netherlands or Singapore?
- Netherlands, at 28.5 DB17-20 methodology against 28.5 DB17-20 methodology in Singapore as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Netherlands and Singapore?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Singapore?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Netherlands and Singapore rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Netherlands ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.