Nicaragua vs Papua New Guinea: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Nicaragua
5.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
5.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Nicaragua rank
166th
Papua New Guinea rank
166th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Nicaragua
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 5.5 DB17-20 methodology against 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 166th and Papua New Guinea ranks 166th of 187 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Nicaragua or Papua New Guinea?
- Nicaragua, at 5.5 DB17-20 methodology against 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Nicaragua and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Papua New Guinea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Nicaragua and Papua New Guinea rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Nicaragua ranks 166th and Papua New Guinea ranks 166th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.