Oman vs Romania: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Oman
17 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Romania
17 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Oman rank
74th
Romania rank
74th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Oman
- Romania
How they compare
Oman currently reports 17 DB17-20 methodology against 17 DB17-20 methodology in Romania, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Oman ahead.
Oman ranks 74th and Romania ranks 74th of 187 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Oman or Romania?
- Oman, at 17 DB17-20 methodology against 17 DB17-20 methodology in Romania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Oman and Romania?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Romania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Oman and Romania rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Oman ranks 74th and Romania ranks 74th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.