Papua New Guinea vs Sierra Leone: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Papua New Guinea
5.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Sierra Leone
5.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
166th
Sierra Leone rank
166th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 5.5 DB17-20 methodology against 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sierra Leone has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 166th and Sierra Leone ranks 166th of 187 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Papua New Guinea or Sierra Leone?
- Papua New Guinea, at 5.5 DB17-20 methodology against 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in Sierra Leone as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Papua New Guinea and Sierra Leone?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Sierra Leone?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Sierra Leone rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 166th and Sierra Leone ranks 166th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.