Rwanda vs Singapore: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Rwanda
28.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Singapore
28.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Rwanda rank
1st
Singapore rank
1st
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Rwanda
- Singapore
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 28.5 DB17-20 methodology against 28.5 DB17-20 methodology in Singapore, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Rwanda or Singapore?
- Rwanda, at 28.5 DB17-20 methodology against 28.5 DB17-20 methodology in Singapore as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Rwanda and Singapore?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Singapore?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Rwanda and Singapore rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Rwanda ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.