Sao Tome and Principe vs South Sudan: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Sao Tome and Principe
4.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
South Sudan
5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe rank
175th
South Sudan rank
173rd
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 175th and South Sudan ranks 173rd of 187 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Sao Tome and Principe or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Sao Tome and Principe and South Sudan?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and South Sudan rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 175th and South Sudan ranks 173rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.