Suriname vs Tunisia: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Suriname
13.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Tunisia
13.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Suriname rank
99th
Tunisia rank
99th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Suriname
- Tunisia
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 13.5 DB17-20 methodology against 13.5 DB17-20 methodology in Tunisia, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Suriname ranks 99th and Tunisia ranks 99th of 187 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Suriname or Tunisia?
- Suriname, at 13.5 DB17-20 methodology against 13.5 DB17-20 methodology in Tunisia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Suriname and Tunisia?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Tunisia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Suriname and Tunisia rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Suriname ranks 99th and Tunisia ranks 99th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.