Angola vs Micronesia (country): Registering property: Time (days) - Score

Angola
9.57
in 2019
Micronesia (country)
0
in 2019
Angola rank
177th
Micronesia (country) rank
179th

Registering property: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Angola
  • Micronesia (country)
0246810200420112019

How they compare

Angola currently reports 9.57 against 0 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 9.57.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Micronesia (country) ahead.

Angola ranks 177th and Micronesia (country) ranks 179th of 188 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Micronesia (country) Difference Ahead
2000s 1.59 0 1.59 Angola
2010s 9.57 0 9.57 Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: time (days) - score, Angola or Micronesia (country)?
Angola, at 9.57 against 0 in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: time (days) - score between Angola and Micronesia (country)?
9.57, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Micronesia (country)?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Angola and Micronesia (country) rank globally for registering property: time (days) - score?
Angola ranks 177th and Micronesia (country) ranks 179th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.