Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Philippines: Registering property: Time (days) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
83.73
in 2019
Philippines
83.73
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
102nd
Philippines rank
102nd
Registering property: Time (days) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Philippines
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 83.73 against 83.73 in Philippines, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Philippines ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 102nd and Philippines ranks 102nd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.67 | 83.73 | 67.07 | Philippines |
| 2010s | 86.65 | 83.73 | 2.92 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: time (days) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Philippines?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 83.73 against 83.73 in Philippines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: time (days) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Philippines?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Philippines?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Philippines rank globally for registering property: time (days) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 102nd and Philippines ranks 102nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.