Brazil vs North Macedonia: Registering property: Time (days) - Score

Brazil
85.77
in 2019
North Macedonia
86.12
in 2019
Brazil rank
87th
North Macedonia rank
84th

Registering property: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Brazil
  • North Macedonia
020406080200420112019

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 86.12 against 85.77 in Brazil, a difference of 0.35.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 87th and North Macedonia ranks 84th of 188 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 87.16 58.45 28.71 Brazil
2010s 86.28 83.35 2.93 Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: time (days) - score, Brazil or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 86.12 against 85.77 in Brazil as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: time (days) - score between Brazil and North Macedonia?
0.35, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and North Macedonia?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Brazil and North Macedonia rank globally for registering property: time (days) - score?
Brazil ranks 87th and North Macedonia ranks 84th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.