Central African Republic vs Gabon: Registering property: Time (days) - Score

Central African Republic
64.59
in 2019
Gabon
66.03
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
160th
Gabon rank
157th

Registering property: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Gabon
020406080200420112019

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 66.03 against 64.59 in Central African Republic, a difference of 1.44.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Gabon ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 160th and Gabon ranks 157th of 188 groups.

Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Gabon Difference Ahead
2000s 64.59 74.74 10.14 Gabon
2010s 64.59 65.07 0.4784 Gabon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: time (days) - score, Central African Republic or Gabon?
Gabon, at 66.03 against 64.59 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: time (days) - score between Central African Republic and Gabon?
1.44, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Gabon?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Central African Republic and Gabon rank globally for registering property: time (days) - score?
Central African Republic ranks 160th and Gabon ranks 157th of 188 groups.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.