Central African Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Registering property: Time (days) - Score
Central African Republic
64.59
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
66.03
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
163rd
Papua New Guinea rank
160th
Registering property: Time (days) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 66.03 against 64.59 in Central African Republic, a difference of 1.44.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 163rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 160th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.59 | 66.03 | 1.44 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 64.59 | 66.03 | 1.44 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: time (days) - score, Central African Republic or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 66.03 against 64.59 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: time (days) - score between Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea?
- 1.44, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea rank globally for registering property: time (days) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 163rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 160th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.