Central African Republic vs Trinidad and Tobago: Registering property: Time (days) - Score
Central African Republic
64.59
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
63.64
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
163rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
165th
Registering property: Time (days) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 64.59 against 63.64 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.95.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 163rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 165th of 191 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.59 | 46.41 | 18.18 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 64.59 | 60.19 | 4.4 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: time (days) - score, Central African Republic or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Central African Republic, at 64.59 against 63.64 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: time (days) - score between Central African Republic and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.95, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for registering property: time (days) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 163rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 165th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.