Congo, Dem. Rep. vs Israel: Registering property: Time (days) - Score

Congo, Dem. Rep.
82.3
in 2019
Israel
82.78
in 2019
Congo, Dem. Rep. rank
106th
Israel rank
104th

Registering property: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Congo, Dem. Rep.
  • Israel
020406080200420112019

How they compare

Israel currently reports 82.78 against 82.3 in Congo, Dem. Rep., a difference of 0.48.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Congo, Dem. Rep. ahead.

Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 106th and Israel ranks 104th of 188 countries.

Congo, Dem. Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Dem. Rep. Israel Difference Ahead
2000s 76.08 31.58 44.5 Congo, Dem. Rep.
2010s 80.29 59.93 20.36 Congo, Dem. Rep.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: time (days) - score, Congo, Dem. Rep. or Israel?
Israel, at 82.78 against 82.3 in Congo, Dem. Rep. as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: time (days) - score between Congo, Dem. Rep. and Israel?
0.48, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Dem. Rep. and Israel?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Congo, Dem. Rep. and Israel rank globally for registering property: time (days) - score?
Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 106th and Israel ranks 104th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.