Democratic Republic of Congo vs Lebanon: Registering property: Time (days) - Score

Democratic Republic of Congo
82.3
in 2019
Lebanon
82.78
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
106th
Lebanon rank
104th

Registering property: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Lebanon
020406080200420112019

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports 82.78 against 82.3 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.48.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 106th and Lebanon ranks 104th of 188 countries.

Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Lebanon Difference Ahead
2000s 76.08 87.08 11 Lebanon
2010s 80.29 84.93 4.64 Lebanon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: time (days) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Lebanon?
Lebanon, at 82.78 against 82.3 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: time (days) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Lebanon?
0.48, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Lebanon?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Lebanon rank globally for registering property: time (days) - score?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 106th and Lebanon ranks 104th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.