Democratic Republic of Congo vs Sri Lanka: Registering property: Time (days) - Score
Democratic Republic of Congo
82.3
in 2019
Sri Lanka
81.82
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
106th
Sri Lanka rank
108th
Registering property: Time (days) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 82.3 against 81.82 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.48.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of Congo has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 106th and Sri Lanka ranks 108th of 188 countries.
Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.08 | 66.51 | 9.57 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 2010s | 80.29 | 75.36 | 4.93 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: time (days) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Sri Lanka?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 82.3 against 81.82 in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: time (days) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Sri Lanka?
- 0.48, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Sri Lanka?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Sri Lanka rank globally for registering property: time (days) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 106th and Sri Lanka ranks 108th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.