Dominican Republic vs Grenada: Registering property: Time (days) - Score

Dominican Republic
84.69
in 2019
Grenada
85.17
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
93rd
Grenada rank
91st

Registering property: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Grenada
020406080200420112019

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 85.17 against 84.69 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.48.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Grenada ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 93rd and Grenada ranks 91st of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Grenada in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Grenada Difference Ahead
2000s 69.95 63.64 6.32 Dominican Republic
2010s 80.1 82.3 2.2 Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: time (days) - score, Dominican Republic or Grenada?
Grenada, at 85.17 against 84.69 in Dominican Republic as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: time (days) - score between Dominican Republic and Grenada?
0.48, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Grenada?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Dominican Republic and Grenada rank globally for registering property: time (days) - score?
Dominican Republic ranks 93rd and Grenada ranks 91st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.