Equatorial Guinea vs Guatemala: Registering property: Time (days) - Score

Equatorial Guinea
89.47
in 2019
Guatemala
89
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
68th
Guatemala rank
71st

Registering property: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Guatemala
020406080200420112019

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 89.47 against 89 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.47.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 68th and Guatemala ranks 71st of 188 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Guatemala Difference Ahead
2000s 89.47 81.63 7.85 Equatorial Guinea
2010s 89.47 89 0.4785 Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: time (days) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Guatemala?
Equatorial Guinea, at 89.47 against 89 in Guatemala as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: time (days) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Guatemala?
0.47, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Guatemala?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Guatemala rank globally for registering property: time (days) - score?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 68th and Guatemala ranks 71st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.