Fiji, Republic of vs Papua New Guinea: Registering property: Time (days) - Score
Fiji, Republic of
67.46
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
66.03
in 2019
Fiji, Republic of rank
157th
Papua New Guinea rank
159th
Registering property: Time (days) - Score over time
- Fiji, Republic of
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Fiji, Republic of currently reports 67.46 against 66.03 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 1.43.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Fiji, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Fiji, Republic of ranks 157th and Papua New Guinea ranks 159th of 190 countries.
Fiji, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji, Republic of | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.94 | 66.03 | 1.91 | Fiji, Republic of |
| 2010s | 67.56 | 66.03 | 1.53 | Fiji, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: time (days) - score, Fiji, Republic of or Papua New Guinea?
- Fiji, Republic of, at 67.46 against 66.03 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: time (days) - score between Fiji, Republic of and Papua New Guinea?
- 1.43, with Fiji, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji, Republic of and Papua New Guinea?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Fiji, Republic of and Papua New Guinea rank globally for registering property: time (days) - score?
- Fiji, Republic of ranks 157th and Papua New Guinea ranks 159th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.