Guinea-Bissau vs Syrian Arab Republic: Registering property: Time (days) - Score
Guinea-Bissau
77.51
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic
77.51
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
129th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
129th
Registering property: Time (days) - Score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 77.51 against 77.51 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Syrian Arab Republic has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 129th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 129th of 190 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.44 | 89.09 | 87.66 | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 54.69 | 85.84 | 31.15 | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: time (days) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 77.51 against 77.51 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: time (days) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for registering property: time (days) - score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 129th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 129th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.