Lithuania vs Netherlands: Registering property: Time (days) - Score

Lithuania
98.8
in 2019
Netherlands
99.28
in 2019
Lithuania rank
8th
Netherlands rank
6th

Registering property: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Lithuania
  • Netherlands
020406080100200420112019

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 99.28 against 98.8 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.48.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 8th and Netherlands ranks 6th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Netherlands Difference Ahead
2000s 98.56 97.85 0.7177 Lithuania
2010s 98.78 98.85 0.0718 Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: time (days) - score, Lithuania or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 99.28 against 98.8 in Lithuania as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: time (days) - score between Lithuania and Netherlands?
0.48, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Netherlands?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Lithuania and Netherlands rank globally for registering property: time (days) - score?
Lithuania ranks 8th and Netherlands ranks 6th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.