Madagascar vs Solomon Islands: Registering property: Time (days) - Score

Madagascar
52.63
in 2019
Solomon Islands
59.09
in 2019
Madagascar rank
169th
Solomon Islands rank
166th

Registering property: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Madagascar
  • Solomon Islands
0204060200420112019

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 59.09 against 52.63 in Madagascar, a difference of 6.46.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Madagascar ahead.

Madagascar ranks 169th and Solomon Islands ranks 166th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 40.83 0 40.83 Madagascar
2010s 52.63 59.11 6.48 Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: time (days) - score, Madagascar or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 59.09 against 52.63 in Madagascar as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: time (days) - score between Madagascar and Solomon Islands?
6.46, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Solomon Islands?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Madagascar and Solomon Islands rank globally for registering property: time (days) - score?
Madagascar ranks 169th and Solomon Islands ranks 166th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.