Malawi vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Registering property: Time (days) - Score
Malawi
77.99
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
77.99
in 2019
Malawi rank
127th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
127th
Registering property: Time (days) - Score over time
- Malawi
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 77.99 against 77.99 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 127th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 127th of 190 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.37 | 82.3 | 23.92 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2010s | 70.53 | 80.57 | 10.05 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: time (days) - score, Malawi or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Malawi, at 77.99 against 77.99 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: time (days) - score between Malawi and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Malawi and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for registering property: time (days) - score?
- Malawi ranks 127th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 127th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.