Mauritania, Islamic Republic of vs South Sudan, Republic of: Registering property: Time (days) - Score
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
77.03
in 2019
South Sudan, Republic of
77.51
in 2019
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of rank
132nd
South Sudan, Republic of rank
129th
Registering property: Time (days) - Score over time
- Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
- South Sudan, Republic of
How they compare
South Sudan, Republic of currently reports 77.51 against 77.03 in Mauritania, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.48.
Across all 8 years both countries report, South Sudan, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 132nd and South Sudan, Republic of ranks 129th of 190 countries.
South Sudan, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: time (days) - score, Mauritania, Islamic Republic of or South Sudan, Republic of?
- South Sudan, Republic of, at 77.51 against 77.03 in Mauritania, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: time (days) - score between Mauritania, Islamic Republic of and South Sudan, Republic of?
- 0.48, with South Sudan, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania, Islamic Republic of and South Sudan, Republic of?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Mauritania, Islamic Republic of and South Sudan, Republic of rank globally for registering property: time (days) - score?
- Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 132nd and South Sudan, Republic of ranks 129th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.