Poland vs Puerto Rico: Registering property: Time (days) - Score

Poland
35.89
in 2019
Puerto Rico
9.57
in 2019
Poland rank
175th
Puerto Rico rank
177th

Registering property: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Poland
  • Puerto Rico
020406080200420112019

How they compare

Poland currently reports 35.89 against 9.57 in Puerto Rico, a difference of 26.32.

That makes Poland's figure about 3.8 times Puerto Rico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Poland ranks 175th and Puerto Rico ranks 177th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
2000s 6.46 7.7 1.24 Puerto Rico
2010s 65.45 8.42 57.03 Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: time (days) - score, Poland or Puerto Rico?
Poland, at 35.89 against 9.57 in Puerto Rico as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: time (days) - score between Poland and Puerto Rico?
26.32, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Puerto Rico?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Poland and Puerto Rico rank globally for registering property: time (days) - score?
Poland ranks 175th and Puerto Rico ranks 177th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.