Qatar vs United Arab Emirates: Registering property: Time (days) - Score

Qatar
100
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
99.76
in 2019
Qatar rank
1st
United Arab Emirates rank
3rd

Registering property: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Qatar
  • United Arab Emirates
020406080100200420112019

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 100 against 99.76 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.24.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.

Qatar ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 3rd of 188 countries.

United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Qatar United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
2000s 94.74 95.69 0.957 United Arab Emirates
2010s 95.26 98.3 3.04 United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: time (days) - score, Qatar or United Arab Emirates?
Qatar, at 100 against 99.76 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: time (days) - score between Qatar and United Arab Emirates?
0.24, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and United Arab Emirates?
13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
How do Qatar and United Arab Emirates rank globally for registering property: time (days) - score?
Qatar ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 3rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.