Russian Federation vs Samoa: Registering property: Time (days) - Score

Russian Federation
93.78
in 2019
Samoa
93.3
in 2019
Russian Federation rank
39th
Samoa rank
42nd

Registering property: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Samoa
406080100200420112019

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 93.78 against 93.3 in Samoa, a difference of 0.48.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Russian Federation ranks 39th and Samoa ranks 42nd of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Samoa Difference Ahead
2000s 76.32 30.14 46.17 Russian Federation
2010s 88.43 92.73 4.29 Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: time (days) - score, Russian Federation or Samoa?
Russian Federation, at 93.78 against 93.3 in Samoa as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: time (days) - score between Russian Federation and Samoa?
0.48, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Samoa?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Russian Federation and Samoa rank globally for registering property: time (days) - score?
Russian Federation ranks 39th and Samoa ranks 42nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.