Democratic Republic of Congo vs Japan: Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6)

Democratic Republic of Congo
4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Japan
4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
39th
Japan rank
39th

Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6) over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Japan
01234201520172019

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in Japan, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 39th and Japan ranks 39th of 187 countries.

Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: transparency of information index (0-6), Democratic Republic of Congo or Japan?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in Japan as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: transparency of information index (0-6) between Democratic Republic of Congo and Japan?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Japan?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Japan rank globally for registering property: transparency of information index (0-6)?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 39th and Japan ranks 39th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Japan: Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6). Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/registering-property-transparency-of-information-index-0-6-db16-20-methodology/congo-dem-rep/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/registering-property-transparency-of-information-index-0-6-db16-20-methodology/congo-dem-rep/japan/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Japan: Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 935 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The transparency of information index evaluates whether the land administration system makes land-related information publicly available. It has ten components: (i) whether information on land ownership is made publicly available; (ii) whether the list of documents required for completing the registra­tion of property transactions is made publicly available; (iii) whether the fee schedule for completing the registration of prop­erty transactions is made publicly available; (iv) whether the agency in charge of immovable property registration commits to a specific time frame for delivering a legally binding document that proves property ownership; (v) whether there is a specific and independent mechanism for filing complaints about a problem that occurred at the agency in charge of immovable property registration; (vi) whether there are publicly available official statistics tracking the number of transactions at the immovable property registration agency; (vii) whether maps of land plots are made publicly available; (viii) whether the fee schedule for accessing maps is made publicly available; and (ix) whether the mapping agency commits to a specific time frame for delivering an updated map; and (x) whether there is a specific and independent mechanism for filing complaints about a problem that occurred at the mapping agency. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.