Mauritius vs Peru: Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6)
Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6) over time
- Mauritius
- Peru
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 6 DB16-20 methodology against 6 DB16-20 methodology in Peru, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: transparency of information index (0-6), Mauritius or Peru?
- Mauritius, at 6 DB16-20 methodology against 6 DB16-20 methodology in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: transparency of information index (0-6) between Mauritius and Peru?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Peru?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Peru rank globally for registering property: transparency of information index (0-6)?
- Mauritius ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The transparency of information index evaluates whether the land administration system makes land-related information publicly available. It has ten components: (i) whether information on land ownership is made publicly available; (ii) whether the list of documents required for completing the registration of property transactions is made publicly available; (iii) whether the fee schedule for completing the registration of property transactions is made publicly available; (iv) whether the agency in charge of immovable property registration commits to a specific time frame for delivering a legally binding document that proves property ownership; (v) whether there is a specific and independent mechanism for filing complaints about a problem that occurred at the agency in charge of immovable property registration; (vi) whether there are publicly available official statistics tracking the number of transactions at the immovable property registration agency; (vii) whether maps of land plots are made publicly available; (viii) whether the fee schedule for accessing maps is made publicly available; and (ix) whether the mapping agency commits to a specific time frame for delivering an updated map; and (x) whether there is a specific and independent mechanism for filing complaints about a problem that occurred at the mapping agency. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.