Antigua and Barbuda vs Sri Lanka: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
96.0%
in 2019
Sri Lanka
95.6%
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
98th
Sri Lanka rank
101st
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 96.0% against 95.6% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 98th and Sri Lanka ranks 101st of 191 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.4% | 79.8% | 14.6% | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 95.2% | 90.2% | 5.0% | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Sri Lanka?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 96.0% against 95.6% in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Sri Lanka?
- 0.4%, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Sri Lanka?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Sri Lanka rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 98th and Sri Lanka ranks 101st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.