Antigua and Barbuda vs Togo: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
96.0%
in 2019
Togo
96.0%
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
98th
Togo rank
99th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Togo
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 96.0% against 96.0% in Togo, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 98th and Togo ranks 99th of 191 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.4% | 0.0% | 94.4% | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 95.2% | 51.1% | 44.1% | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Togo?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 96.0% against 96.0% in Togo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Togo?
- 0.0%, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Togo?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Togo rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 98th and Togo ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.