Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Iraq: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
81.4%
in 2019
Iraq
82.9%
in 2019
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
162nd
Iraq rank
159th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Iraq
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 82.9% against 81.4% in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, a difference of 1.5%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Iraq ahead.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 162nd and Iraq ranks 159th of 191 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.5% | 68.7% | 35.2% | Iraq |
| 2010s | 69.9% | 72.8% | 3.0% | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Iraq?
- Iraq, at 82.9% against 81.4% in Bolivia, Plurinational State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Iraq?
- 1.5%, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Iraq?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Iraq rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 162nd and Iraq ranks 159th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.