Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cape Verde: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
93.2%
in 2019
Cape Verde
93.5%
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
123rd
Cape Verde rank
120th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Cape Verde
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 93.5% against 93.2% in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 123rd and Cape Verde ranks 120th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Cape Verde in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Cape Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.3% | 81.8% | 2.5% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 88.8% | 92.5% | 3.7% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Cape Verde?
- Cape Verde, at 93.5% against 93.2% in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cape Verde?
- 0.3%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cape Verde?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cape Verde rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 123rd and Cape Verde ranks 120th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.