Brazil vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Brazil
97.9%
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic
97.7%
in 2019
Brazil rank
69th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
72nd
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Brazil
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 97.9% against 97.7% in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 69th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 72nd of 191 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.0% | 87.9% | 7.0% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 97.4% | 95.3% | 2.1% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Brazil or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- Brazil, at 97.9% against 97.7% in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Brazil and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 0.2%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Brazil ranks 69th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 72nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.