Brunei Darussalam vs Czechia: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Brunei Darussalam
99.5%
in 2019
Czechia
99.4%
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
32nd
Czechia rank
35th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Czechia
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 99.5% against 99.4% in Czechia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brunei Darussalam ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 32nd and Czechia ranks 35th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brunei Darussalam averaged higher in 1 and Czechia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.4% | 95.2% | 0.2% | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2010s | 96.9% | 97.3% | 0.4% | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Brunei Darussalam or Czechia?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 99.5% against 99.4% in Czechia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Brunei Darussalam and Czechia?
- 0.1%, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Czechia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Czechia rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 32nd and Czechia ranks 35th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.