Burkina Faso vs Tanzania: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Burkina Faso
78.6%
in 2019
Tanzania
79.7%
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
170th
Tanzania rank
167th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 79.7% against 78.6% in Burkina Faso, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 170th and Tanzania ranks 167th of 191 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.8% | 13.3% | 34.6% | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 77.5% | 65.1% | 12.4% | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Burkina Faso or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 79.7% against 78.6% in Burkina Faso as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Burkina Faso and Tanzania?
- 1.1%, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Tanzania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Tanzania rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 170th and Tanzania ranks 167th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.