Cape Verde vs Marshall Islands: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Cape Verde
93.5%
in 2019
Marshall Islands
93.6%
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
120th
Marshall Islands rank
119th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Cape Verde
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 93.6% against 93.5% in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 120th and Marshall Islands ranks 119th of 191 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.8% | 90.8% | 9.0% | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 92.5% | 93.2% | 0.7% | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Cape Verde or Marshall Islands?
- Marshall Islands, at 93.6% against 93.5% in Cape Verde as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Cape Verde and Marshall Islands?
- 0.1%, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Marshall Islands?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Cape Verde and Marshall Islands rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Cape Verde ranks 120th and Marshall Islands ranks 119th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.