Cape Verde vs Sao Tome and Principe: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Cape Verde
93.5%
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
93.8%
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
120th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
117th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Cape Verde
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 93.8% against 93.5% in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 120th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 117th of 191 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.8% | 25.4% | 56.4% | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 92.5% | 88.1% | 4.4% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Cape Verde or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 93.8% against 93.5% in Cape Verde as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Cape Verde and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.3%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Cape Verde and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Cape Verde ranks 120th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 117th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.