Cambodia vs Ethiopia: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Cambodia
73.3%
in 2019
Ethiopia
77.3%
in 2019
Cambodia rank
175th
Ethiopia rank
172nd
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Cambodia
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 77.3% against 73.3% in Cambodia, a difference of 4.0%.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 175th and Ethiopia ranks 172nd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Ethiopia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.7% | 52.1% | 43.4% | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 58.4% | 48.3% | 10.1% | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Cambodia or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 77.3% against 73.3% in Cambodia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Cambodia and Ethiopia?
- 4.0%, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Ethiopia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Cambodia and Ethiopia rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Cambodia ranks 175th and Ethiopia ranks 172nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.