Central African Republic vs Suriname: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Central African Republic
36.1%
in 2019
Suriname
53.3%
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
186th
Suriname rank
184th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 53.3% against 36.1% in Central African Republic, a difference of 17.2%.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.5 times Central African Republic's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 186th and Suriname ranks 184th of 191 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 31.5% | 31.5% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 17.6% | 49.6% | 32.0% | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Central African Republic or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 53.3% against 36.1% in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Central African Republic and Suriname?
- 17.2%, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Suriname?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Suriname rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 186th and Suriname ranks 184th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.