China vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
China
99.5%
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of
99.5%
in 2019
China rank
34th
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
33rd
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- China
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 99.5% against 99.5% in China, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
China ranks 34th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 33rd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Iran, Islamic Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.5% | 97.2% | 2.7% | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
| 2010s | 99.0% | 98.7% | 0.3% | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, China or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 99.5% against 99.5% in China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between China and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 0.0%, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do China and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- China ranks 34th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 33rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.