Colombia vs Dominican Republic: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Colombia
92.9%
in 2019
Dominican Republic
93.2%
in 2019
Colombia rank
127th
Dominican Republic rank
124th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Colombia
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 93.2% against 92.9% in Colombia, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 127th and Dominican Republic ranks 124th of 191 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.7% | 86.7% | 3.0% | Colombia |
| 2010s | 94.2% | 91.8% | 2.4% | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Colombia or Dominican Republic?
- Dominican Republic, at 93.2% against 92.9% in Colombia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Colombia and Dominican Republic?
- 0.3%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Dominican Republic?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Colombia and Dominican Republic rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Colombia ranks 127th and Dominican Republic ranks 124th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.